Review



gaussian mixture models (gmm) implemented in matlab (v.2019b)  (MathWorks Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol MathWorks Inc is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 90

    Structured Review

    MathWorks Inc gaussian mixture models (gmm) implemented in matlab (v.2019b)
    a , Distance distributions of spin-labelled µOR under different ligand conditions. b , Distance distributions in the presence of ligand and G i . c , Distance distributions of phosphorylated µOR (µORp) in the presence of ligand and pre-activated β-arrestin-1 (βarr1). a – c , Shaded areas along the line indicate 95% confidence interval. d , <t>Gaussian</t> populations centred around 26 Å, 33 Å, 39 Å and 43 Å. Data represent median population ± 95% confidence interval derived from bootstrapping analysis using n = 1,000 iterations. Populations marked with asterisks have non-overlapping confidence intervals in the presence and absence of transducer.
    Gaussian Mixture Models (Gmm) Implemented In Matlab (V.2019b), supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/gaussian+mixture+models+(gmm)+implemented+in+matlab+(v%2E2019b)/pmc11078757-286-5-11
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    gaussian mixture models (gmm) implemented in matlab (v.2019b) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Ligand efficacy modulates conformational dynamics of the µ-opioid receptor"

    Article Title: Ligand efficacy modulates conformational dynamics of the µ-opioid receptor

    Journal: Nature

    doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07295-2

    a , Distance distributions of spin-labelled µOR under different ligand conditions. b , Distance distributions in the presence of ligand and G i . c , Distance distributions of phosphorylated µOR (µORp) in the presence of ligand and pre-activated β-arrestin-1 (βarr1). a – c , Shaded areas along the line indicate 95% confidence interval. d , Gaussian populations centred around 26 Å, 33 Å, 39 Å and 43 Å. Data represent median population ± 95% confidence interval derived from bootstrapping analysis using n = 1,000 iterations. Populations marked with asterisks have non-overlapping confidence intervals in the presence and absence of transducer.
    Figure Legend Snippet: a , Distance distributions of spin-labelled µOR under different ligand conditions. b , Distance distributions in the presence of ligand and G i . c , Distance distributions of phosphorylated µOR (µORp) in the presence of ligand and pre-activated β-arrestin-1 (βarr1). a – c , Shaded areas along the line indicate 95% confidence interval. d , Gaussian populations centred around 26 Å, 33 Å, 39 Å and 43 Å. Data represent median population ± 95% confidence interval derived from bootstrapping analysis using n = 1,000 iterations. Populations marked with asterisks have non-overlapping confidence intervals in the presence and absence of transducer.

    Techniques Used: Derivative Assay

    Populations from 6 Gaussian peaks of 30 DEER datasets are shown as scatter plot. Each blue dot represents one of the 30 samples. Red lines are the results of a linear fit. Numbers in each subpanel are corresponding correlation coefficients, which are labeled by a star (*) and red color if p < 0.05.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Populations from 6 Gaussian peaks of 30 DEER datasets are shown as scatter plot. Each blue dot represents one of the 30 samples. Red lines are the results of a linear fit. Numbers in each subpanel are corresponding correlation coefficients, which are labeled by a star (*) and red color if p < 0.05.

    Techniques Used: Labeling, IF-P

    a , Schematic of single-molecule FRET experiment. Labelled µOR was tethered to a cover slip via its Flag tag, biotinylated M1 Fab, streptavidin (SA) and biotinylated PEG. TIRFM, total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy. b , c , SmFRET distributions of µOR–Cy3/Cy5 ( b ) and µOR–Cy3/Cy7 ( c ) in the presence of different ligands. Gaussian peaks were fitted to FRET states (red and blue) and background noise (black). Green lines represent the cumulative fitted distributions. Dashed lines in blue and red represent peak centres of naloxone- and DAMGO-bound samples, respectively ( n represents the number of fluorescence traces used to calculate the corresponding histograms). Data are mean ± s.d. from three repeats.
    Figure Legend Snippet: a , Schematic of single-molecule FRET experiment. Labelled µOR was tethered to a cover slip via its Flag tag, biotinylated M1 Fab, streptavidin (SA) and biotinylated PEG. TIRFM, total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy. b , c , SmFRET distributions of µOR–Cy3/Cy5 ( b ) and µOR–Cy3/Cy7 ( c ) in the presence of different ligands. Gaussian peaks were fitted to FRET states (red and blue) and background noise (black). Green lines represent the cumulative fitted distributions. Dashed lines in blue and red represent peak centres of naloxone- and DAMGO-bound samples, respectively ( n represents the number of fluorescence traces used to calculate the corresponding histograms). Data are mean ± s.d. from three repeats.

    Techniques Used: FLAG-tag, Fluorescence, Microscopy

    a , b , µOR∆7-R182C/R273C is labeled with Cy3/Cy5. c – e , µOR∆7-R182C/R276C is labeled with Cy3/Cy5. f – h , µOR∆7-R182C/R276C is labeled with Cy3/Cy7. FRET distributions of µOR∆7-R182C/R276C labeled with Cy3/Cy5 (c) and Cy3/Cy7 (f). Error bars in c and f indicate s.d. from 3 repeats. FRET peak centers of µOR∆7-R182/R273 + Cy3/Cy5 (a, related to Fig. ), µOR∆7-R182/R276 + Cy3/Cy5 (d), and µOR∆7-R182/R276 + Cy3/Cy7 (g). The numbers on each bar are the peak centers extracted from the Gaussian fitting. Error bars indicate standard errors of the fitting. FRET values of each frame of µOR samples in Fig. (b), Extended Data Fig. 9c (e), and Extended Data Fig. 9f (h) are plotted as box-and-whisker plots. IQR, inter qaurtile range. The number of traces of each condition is indicated in the corresponding histograms. FRET efficiencies between 0.6 and 1.2 (b and e) and between 0 and 1.2 (h) were used for one-way ANOVA Tukey’s test. ***, p < 0.001. n.s., not significant.
    Figure Legend Snippet: a , b , µOR∆7-R182C/R273C is labeled with Cy3/Cy5. c – e , µOR∆7-R182C/R276C is labeled with Cy3/Cy5. f – h , µOR∆7-R182C/R276C is labeled with Cy3/Cy7. FRET distributions of µOR∆7-R182C/R276C labeled with Cy3/Cy5 (c) and Cy3/Cy7 (f). Error bars in c and f indicate s.d. from 3 repeats. FRET peak centers of µOR∆7-R182/R273 + Cy3/Cy5 (a, related to Fig. ), µOR∆7-R182/R276 + Cy3/Cy5 (d), and µOR∆7-R182/R276 + Cy3/Cy7 (g). The numbers on each bar are the peak centers extracted from the Gaussian fitting. Error bars indicate standard errors of the fitting. FRET values of each frame of µOR samples in Fig. (b), Extended Data Fig. 9c (e), and Extended Data Fig. 9f (h) are plotted as box-and-whisker plots. IQR, inter qaurtile range. The number of traces of each condition is indicated in the corresponding histograms. FRET efficiencies between 0.6 and 1.2 (b and e) and between 0 and 1.2 (h) were used for one-way ANOVA Tukey’s test. ***, p < 0.001. n.s., not significant.

    Techniques Used: Labeling, Whisker Assay



    Similar Products

    90
    MathWorks Inc gaussian mixture models (gmm) implemented in matlab (v.2019b)
    a , Distance distributions of spin-labelled µOR under different ligand conditions. b , Distance distributions in the presence of ligand and G i . c , Distance distributions of phosphorylated µOR (µORp) in the presence of ligand and pre-activated β-arrestin-1 (βarr1). a – c , Shaded areas along the line indicate 95% confidence interval. d , <t>Gaussian</t> populations centred around 26 Å, 33 Å, 39 Å and 43 Å. Data represent median population ± 95% confidence interval derived from bootstrapping analysis using n = 1,000 iterations. Populations marked with asterisks have non-overlapping confidence intervals in the presence and absence of transducer.
    Gaussian Mixture Models (Gmm) Implemented In Matlab (V.2019b), supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/gaussian+mixture+models+(gmm)+implemented+in+matlab+(v%2E2019b)/pmc11078757-286-5-11
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    gaussian mixture models (gmm) implemented in matlab (v.2019b) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    a , Distance distributions of spin-labelled µOR under different ligand conditions. b , Distance distributions in the presence of ligand and G i . c , Distance distributions of phosphorylated µOR (µORp) in the presence of ligand and pre-activated β-arrestin-1 (βarr1). a – c , Shaded areas along the line indicate 95% confidence interval. d , Gaussian populations centred around 26 Å, 33 Å, 39 Å and 43 Å. Data represent median population ± 95% confidence interval derived from bootstrapping analysis using n = 1,000 iterations. Populations marked with asterisks have non-overlapping confidence intervals in the presence and absence of transducer.

    Journal: Nature

    Article Title: Ligand efficacy modulates conformational dynamics of the µ-opioid receptor

    doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07295-2

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a , Distance distributions of spin-labelled µOR under different ligand conditions. b , Distance distributions in the presence of ligand and G i . c , Distance distributions of phosphorylated µOR (µORp) in the presence of ligand and pre-activated β-arrestin-1 (βarr1). a – c , Shaded areas along the line indicate 95% confidence interval. d , Gaussian populations centred around 26 Å, 33 Å, 39 Å and 43 Å. Data represent median population ± 95% confidence interval derived from bootstrapping analysis using n = 1,000 iterations. Populations marked with asterisks have non-overlapping confidence intervals in the presence and absence of transducer.

    Article Snippet: DEER data were processed via Gaussian mixture models (GMM) implemented in Matlab (v.2019b) using the DEERlab toolbox (v.0.9.2) .

    Techniques: Derivative Assay

    Populations from 6 Gaussian peaks of 30 DEER datasets are shown as scatter plot. Each blue dot represents one of the 30 samples. Red lines are the results of a linear fit. Numbers in each subpanel are corresponding correlation coefficients, which are labeled by a star (*) and red color if p < 0.05.

    Journal: Nature

    Article Title: Ligand efficacy modulates conformational dynamics of the µ-opioid receptor

    doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07295-2

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Populations from 6 Gaussian peaks of 30 DEER datasets are shown as scatter plot. Each blue dot represents one of the 30 samples. Red lines are the results of a linear fit. Numbers in each subpanel are corresponding correlation coefficients, which are labeled by a star (*) and red color if p < 0.05.

    Article Snippet: DEER data were processed via Gaussian mixture models (GMM) implemented in Matlab (v.2019b) using the DEERlab toolbox (v.0.9.2) .

    Techniques: Labeling, IF-P

    a , Schematic of single-molecule FRET experiment. Labelled µOR was tethered to a cover slip via its Flag tag, biotinylated M1 Fab, streptavidin (SA) and biotinylated PEG. TIRFM, total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy. b , c , SmFRET distributions of µOR–Cy3/Cy5 ( b ) and µOR–Cy3/Cy7 ( c ) in the presence of different ligands. Gaussian peaks were fitted to FRET states (red and blue) and background noise (black). Green lines represent the cumulative fitted distributions. Dashed lines in blue and red represent peak centres of naloxone- and DAMGO-bound samples, respectively ( n represents the number of fluorescence traces used to calculate the corresponding histograms). Data are mean ± s.d. from three repeats.

    Journal: Nature

    Article Title: Ligand efficacy modulates conformational dynamics of the µ-opioid receptor

    doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07295-2

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a , Schematic of single-molecule FRET experiment. Labelled µOR was tethered to a cover slip via its Flag tag, biotinylated M1 Fab, streptavidin (SA) and biotinylated PEG. TIRFM, total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy. b , c , SmFRET distributions of µOR–Cy3/Cy5 ( b ) and µOR–Cy3/Cy7 ( c ) in the presence of different ligands. Gaussian peaks were fitted to FRET states (red and blue) and background noise (black). Green lines represent the cumulative fitted distributions. Dashed lines in blue and red represent peak centres of naloxone- and DAMGO-bound samples, respectively ( n represents the number of fluorescence traces used to calculate the corresponding histograms). Data are mean ± s.d. from three repeats.

    Article Snippet: DEER data were processed via Gaussian mixture models (GMM) implemented in Matlab (v.2019b) using the DEERlab toolbox (v.0.9.2) .

    Techniques: FLAG-tag, Fluorescence, Microscopy

    a , b , µOR∆7-R182C/R273C is labeled with Cy3/Cy5. c – e , µOR∆7-R182C/R276C is labeled with Cy3/Cy5. f – h , µOR∆7-R182C/R276C is labeled with Cy3/Cy7. FRET distributions of µOR∆7-R182C/R276C labeled with Cy3/Cy5 (c) and Cy3/Cy7 (f). Error bars in c and f indicate s.d. from 3 repeats. FRET peak centers of µOR∆7-R182/R273 + Cy3/Cy5 (a, related to Fig. ), µOR∆7-R182/R276 + Cy3/Cy5 (d), and µOR∆7-R182/R276 + Cy3/Cy7 (g). The numbers on each bar are the peak centers extracted from the Gaussian fitting. Error bars indicate standard errors of the fitting. FRET values of each frame of µOR samples in Fig. (b), Extended Data Fig. 9c (e), and Extended Data Fig. 9f (h) are plotted as box-and-whisker plots. IQR, inter qaurtile range. The number of traces of each condition is indicated in the corresponding histograms. FRET efficiencies between 0.6 and 1.2 (b and e) and between 0 and 1.2 (h) were used for one-way ANOVA Tukey’s test. ***, p < 0.001. n.s., not significant.

    Journal: Nature

    Article Title: Ligand efficacy modulates conformational dynamics of the µ-opioid receptor

    doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07295-2

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a , b , µOR∆7-R182C/R273C is labeled with Cy3/Cy5. c – e , µOR∆7-R182C/R276C is labeled with Cy3/Cy5. f – h , µOR∆7-R182C/R276C is labeled with Cy3/Cy7. FRET distributions of µOR∆7-R182C/R276C labeled with Cy3/Cy5 (c) and Cy3/Cy7 (f). Error bars in c and f indicate s.d. from 3 repeats. FRET peak centers of µOR∆7-R182/R273 + Cy3/Cy5 (a, related to Fig. ), µOR∆7-R182/R276 + Cy3/Cy5 (d), and µOR∆7-R182/R276 + Cy3/Cy7 (g). The numbers on each bar are the peak centers extracted from the Gaussian fitting. Error bars indicate standard errors of the fitting. FRET values of each frame of µOR samples in Fig. (b), Extended Data Fig. 9c (e), and Extended Data Fig. 9f (h) are plotted as box-and-whisker plots. IQR, inter qaurtile range. The number of traces of each condition is indicated in the corresponding histograms. FRET efficiencies between 0.6 and 1.2 (b and e) and between 0 and 1.2 (h) were used for one-way ANOVA Tukey’s test. ***, p < 0.001. n.s., not significant.

    Article Snippet: DEER data were processed via Gaussian mixture models (GMM) implemented in Matlab (v.2019b) using the DEERlab toolbox (v.0.9.2) .

    Techniques: Labeling, Whisker Assay